Want to shoot in low light with no flash or tripod? Ilford Delta 3200 & Kodak TMAX p3200 are two great options!
They’re both high 3200 iso B&W stocks that perform well in low light but produce different looks.
TMAX p3200 has punchy tones, strong contrast, and surprisingly fine-grain while Delta 3200 has more subtle tones, mild contrast, and more noticeable but still good-looking grain. We’ll be shooting these once again to show a wider variety of side-by-side comparisons, like; night scenes, daylight portraits, how they perform with under and overexposure, and will show more info on how each shot was metered!
Click to view full image
Photo Below: Delta 3200 Left | T-MAX P3200 RightContrast – The largest notable difference is the contrast with the TMAX p3200 (right) popping a bit more than the subtle contrast of Delta 3200.
Grain – TMAX’s grain appears to be much finer than Delta.
Exposure – While both films have great exposure latitude and do well with overexposure, the TMAX seems to be a little more versatile because Delta images get a little muddy in the underexposed parts of the photo.
View enlarged comparison image
Delta 3200 Left | T-MAX P3200 RightContrast – The largest notable difference is the contrast with the TMAX p3200 (right) popping a bit more than the subtle contrast of Delta 3200.
Grain – TMAX’s grain appears to be much finer than Delta.
Exposure – While both films have great exposure latitude and do well with overexposure, the TMAX seems to be a little more versatile because Delta images get a little muddy in the underexposed parts of the photo.
Comparing the Kodak reintroduced TMAX p3200 to Ilford’s Delta 3200. The Darkroom shoots both with the same camera/lens combo and box settings metering for shadows.
Read full film comparison article..
Photo Below: Delta 3200 Left | T-MAX P3200 RightContrast – The largest notable difference is the contrast with the TMAX p3200 (right) popping a bit more than the subtle contrast of Delta 3200.
Grain – TMAX’s grain appears to be much finer than Delta.
Exposure – While both films have great exposure latitude and do well with overexposure, the TMAX seems to be a little more versatile because Delta images get a little muddy in the underexposed parts of the photo.
See image detail or enlarged view
Photo Below: Delta 3200 Left | T-MAX P3200 RightContrast – The largest notable difference is the contrast with the TMAX p3200 (right) popping a bit more than the subtle contrast of Delta 3200.
Grain – TMAX’s grain appears to be much finer than Delta.
Exposure – While both films have great exposure latitude and do well with overexposure, the TMAX seems to be a little more versatile because Delta images get a little muddy in the underexposed parts of the photo.
The Darkroom Swag
Display the stoke with our shirts, hats, totes, gift cards, and more.
Comparing the Kodak reintroduced TMAX p3200 to Ilford’s Delta 3200. The Darkroom shoots both with the same camera/lens combo and box settings metering for shadows. Read full film comparison article..
Delta 3200 Left | T-MAX P3200 RightContrast – The largest notable difference is the contrast with the TMAX p3200 (right) popping a bit more than the subtle contrast of Delta 3200. Grain – TMAX’s grain appears to be much finer than Delta. Exposure – While both films have great exposure latitude and do well with overexposure, the TMAX seems to be a little more versatile because Delta images get a little muddy in the underexposed parts of the photo. View enlarged comparison image
Delta 3200 Left | T-MAX P3200 RightContrast – The largest notable difference is the contrast with the TMAX p3200 (right) popping a bit more than the subtle contrast of Delta 3200. Grain – TMAX’s grain appears to be much finer than Delta. Exposure – While both films have great exposure latitude and do well with overexposure, the TMAX seems to be a little more versatile because Delta images get a little muddy in the underexposed parts of the photo. View enlarged comparison image Delta 3200 Left | T-MAX P3200 RightContrast – The largest notable difference is the contrast with the TMAX p3200 (right) popping a bit more than the subtle contrast of Delta 3200. Grain – TMAX’s grain appears to be much finer than Delta. Exposure – While both films have great exposure latitude and do well with overexposure, the TMAX seems to be a little more versatile because Delta images get a little muddy in the underexposed parts of the photo. View enlarged comparison image
4 replies on “Shoot Low light films without flash or tripod.”
test
Seems that the Tmax 3200 has better blacks and more contrast. What were they developed in?
The TMAX 3200 is a much better film in my opinion. I used it to shoot dog shows where flash is not allowed for a project I was working on. Great contrast and better definition. I processed my own in TMAX developer. I found the Ilford to appear washed out.
The TMAX 3200 is a much better film in my opinion. I used it to shoot dog shows where flash is not allowed for a project I was working on. Great contrast and better definition. I processed my own in TMAX developer. I found the Ilford to appear washed out.
My Account
Gift Cards
Film Index
FAQ
Film Developing
35mm
120/220
Single Use Cameras
110/126/Advantix
Sheet Film
Scan Negs/Slides
Prints
Prints from Digital Files
Enlargements
Canvas, Metal & More
Bamboo Blocks
HD Metal
Your Account & Albums
test
Seems that the Tmax 3200 has better blacks and more contrast. What were they developed in?
The TMAX 3200 is a much better film in my opinion. I used it to shoot dog shows where flash is not allowed for a project I was working on. Great contrast and better definition. I processed my own in TMAX developer. I found the Ilford to appear washed out.
The TMAX 3200 is a much better film in my opinion. I used it to shoot dog shows where flash is not allowed for a project I was working on. Great contrast and better definition. I processed my own in TMAX developer. I found the Ilford to appear washed out.