June 22, 2018 / By Trevor Lee / In Camera Reviews,Photo Lab Blog

T-MAX P3200 vs Delta 3200 – 35mm Film Format Side by Side Comparisons

Now that Kodak reintroduced their TMAX p3200 35mm film, the question is how does it compare to Ilford Delta 3200?


We shot both side-by-side with the same camera/lens combo, same settings at box speed – metering for the shadows. While both are high-speed B&W 35mm film stocks, they do have some noticeable differences:

Contrast

The main difference is the contrast – TMAX p3200 has much more contrast which makes it pop a little more than the more subtle contrast of Delta 3200.

Grain

TMAX’s grain seems to be much finer than Delta’s larger, more noticeable grain.

Exposure

Both have great exposure latitude and we recommend metering for the shadows. Both do well with overexposure, but TMAX seems to be a little more versatile because unlike Delta, it’s less prone to get muddy in underexposed parts of the photo.

Overall both are great film stocks. It all comes down to what you prefer. Delta is much more subtle in every way, has better detail in the shadows, and has a classic black & white look, while TMAX is more dynamic with its strong contrast, rich tones, and very sharp grain. One advantage of Delta 3200 is, unlike TMAX p3200, it is made in 120 as well. TMAX is only sold in 35mm format. See our Ilford Delta 3200 35mm and 120 film format comparison

What’s better: TriX pushed 3 stops to 3200 or TMAX 3200 at box speed?
In our opinion, TMAX p3200 is the best way to go. Depending on the light, TriX 400 pushed 3 stops to 3200 can have too much contrast which will blow out your highlights. In the same situation, TMAX p3200 will have less contrast giving you better detail in the shadows.

See our T-Max P3200 photo test


T-MAX P3200 vs Delta 3200 Comparison


Kodak TMAX p3200 Images


Ilford Delta 3200 Images

5 responses to “T-MAX P3200 vs Delta 3200 – 35mm Film Format Side by Side Comparisons”

  1. henrycode5 says:

    Awesome comparison. Thanks guys. Now to order some TMAX.

  2. What a comparison! In these days, it’s hard to find such a thing, thank you for that!

  3. wayne56 says:

    Very helpful information-thanks!
    I use and enjoy both types of films.
    Any particular reason why the Kodak Duaflex Was chosen for the test? I didnt realize their lenses were sharp enough for testing film characteristics.
    Thanks!
    Wayne

  4. Giorgio says:

    Very nice comparison for the king era of photography.
    Regards from Italy

Join The Conversation

Note: We don’t monitor the comments very often, so please contact us directly if you have questions.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *