Kodak TRI-X 400 - Film Gallery

User Reviews

Submit Review
4.4
4.4 rating
4.4 out of 5 stars (based on 5 reviews)
Excellent80%
Very good0%
Average0%
Poor20%
Terrible0%

Submit Your Review

Close

Film

5.0 rating
February 23, 2021

I have 6 rolls of trix400. Can you help me find out what kind of camera I need please. Thank you in advance

Sally Romano Doyle

The "standard", just not for me.

2.0 rating
July 18, 2020

I know this is the tried and true “standard” of the world, but I’m not a fan. I rate my results as average and never better. Once I started shooting Kodak HIE b&w infrared years ago, that became my go-to b&w film for its high contrast.
Having just shot Tri-X again for the first time in 30 years, my opinion has not changed. Kodak HIE is gone, but I’ve found better Ilford b&w film but for contrast and grain, I’m loving Bergger.

Thomas R Janowski

The Classic

5.0 rating
January 31, 2020

There is a reason why this film has been a standard in the industry for so long. Some of the most iconic B+W images have been taken on this emulsion. It has amazing latitude and can be pushed and pulled to extreme levels. It tends to be a bit grainier than some of the other B+W options, but it does give the images that classic Tri-X feel that seems to be impossible to recreate digitally. You can’t go wrong with this film. This is my favorite and most consistent B+W film.

Josh Mellema

Excellent for taking photos in cities

5.0 rating
December 2, 2019

Kodak Tri-X 400 was my first roll of black and white film, and I was blown away by how well it turned out. I used it to take pictures of buildings in a local city and loved the contrast and grain.

Jason Morrison

Maybe the perfect film

5.0 rating
September 27, 2019

Tri-X has the perfect amount of contrast for me, wide exposure latitude, minimal grain, and it pushes well. Perfect for street photography and portraiture. One of the titans of the analog world.

Denton Schmidt