Fujifilm Pro 400H - the only film that could compete with Portra!
The colors were are spot an accurate – neutral. Greens and Blue EXPLODE – just the opposite of Kodak Portra/Gold. Kodak is the exact opposite as the Red/Yellow and Golds explode. Kodak and Fuji have each their own looks. Sharpness is excellent with this film as well. Fuji did better with keeping fluorescent lighting in check and not over exaggerating sunlight as opposed to Kodak doing better enhancing sunsets. Fuji Pro 400h was the only film that kept Kodak from running the prices sky high. Now it’s gone… Kodak prices are up unbelievable high and Fuji thinks the X100VI can replicate this look reliably (which it can NOT). We should all lament the death of this film… It will be sorly missed.
Good in all conditions
Nice color without being overly saturated. Nice contrast. Handled bright sunny conditions well but better in even light. I used it for landscapes, nature shots, car shows, and some portraits. Very nice overall results. Very low grain.
Love it. Better than Portra 400 for me.
Skin tones are spot on. Everything looks natural. I haven’t had that luck with Portra.
Great for outdoor scenes
Really lovely film to work with when there are lots of blues and greens. Skin tones can be problematic though. Overall a nice film with a desaturated palette.
my all time favourite...
I just love this film, especially in 120. From the 1st day I shot this. Love the overall color and “tonality”, skin-tones are beautiful, latitude is amazing, grain is nice … very happy every time I shoot it. So for someone that does not like the “warm” look and Saturation of Porta this is the Film to get. Sadly it’s a bit harder to get (in Germany) and also a bit pricy, still i’ll always choose this film for all of my Color-Projects, especially in 120
why does this film have zero stars? It is amazing
This is an amazing film, beautiful pastel skin tones, nice greens and browns. Looks great overexposed. Nice grain! What more can you ask for? A lovely alternative to portra👍