Good Color Option
Pleasantly surprised by this film, and with the prices going up so much this one will definitely be an option. I liked how it rendered colors, it’s reasonably sharp, and the speed is nice. At 200 it fits nicely between all the others at mostly 100 and 400. I shot it with a stop of overexposure (100) to brighten it up a bit
Favorite Consumer 35mm Color Film
Hard to find anymore, but I love it for use in old (1965 and before) and newer (1965 and newer) cameras for general nature/landscape and family photos. Reminds me of the color photos when I was a kid (1970’s) — a little warm and oversaturated. Very please in prints as well as online.
Not bad for the price but not my favorite inexpensive film.
Pros: The sharpness and light to med grain of the film. Low cost.
Cons: I have found that for portraits, the color has a green tint, not strong enough to be an interesting look, but strong enough that I have to adjust in post, which can be annoying if there are a lot of keepers in a roll and it is the only thing that needs adjusting. Not as much an issue for landscapes. For about the same price, I would recommend Kodak Gold 200 instead.