Kodak Gold 200 - Film Gallery

User Reviews

Submit Review
4.1
Rated 4.1 out of 5
4.1 out of 5 stars (based on 14 reviews)
Excellent36%
Very good36%
Average28%
Poor0%
Terrible0%

Submit Your Review

Close

If you want clear razor sharp lines and details, I recomennd shooting digital instead!

Rated 5 out of 5
September 6, 2025

No, just kidding! 😀 I’ve shot a perfectly lit scene of the Popocatepetl, the highest active volcano in Mexico, at the time of writing this comment.

To be honest, the anti halation layer is not the strongest, because I got some halations on the trees in the foreground, but overall, nice vibrant yellows and orange/brown tones. The greens just fit nicely slightly more yellow into the overall very warm scene! If you print the negative 40×60 cm, and grain is your thing or, at least, you don’t mind, if it’s visible on the print, then this film is definetly for you! This is a good film for capturing and enlarging the overall scene, because it will be undeniably difficult to enlarge the small details you’ve captured in the scene! Otherwise, the 200 ISO allows you to use a fairly fast shutter speed, even in overcast conditions, that’s a big advantage compared to Kodak Ektachrome for example! I still think that Kodak Gold is, considering the comparably low price for this film, THE best and consistent film I’ve ever shot!

Patrik Krispler

Great

Rated 5 out of 5
May 8, 2025

First time using it and have gotten two rolls developed and loved it so far. I just use a point and shoot Nikon for fun, but seeing how these came out made me happy and want to do it more and maybe take it more seriously. Can’t wait to shoot more with this!

Cam

Very Good Film for Everyday Use

Rated 4 out of 5
April 30, 2024

At first I was a bit underwhelmed by this film, as is seemed to have low saturation. However, the more I look at the pictures, the more I like it.

Justin Lancaster

The Warmest Warm

Rated 5 out of 5
March 25, 2024

I knew this film’s reputation before I even loaded it. Highly recommend using outdoors in sunlight. It did not disappoint.

Andrew Karmun

Amazing

Rated 5 out of 5
September 24, 2022

My first time shooting with Kodak gold a lot of the pictures were mid-day but they still had a lot of sunset colors and it also seemed to get rid of some light blue tones. Gave a very vintage kinda look.

Gabriel

First Film I’ve Ever Used.

Rated 4 out of 5
July 16, 2022

As the title says, Kodak Gold 200 is the first film stock I’ve ever used, and the only reason I’m not giving it 5 stars is because I’ve yet to try anything else. This film is decently affordable and produces an amazing warm tone onto your photos that I personally really enjoy. All in all pretty great and I hope to start shooting more kinds of film in the future.

Jake Evans

The more I go back to Gold, the more I enjoy it

Rated 4 out of 5
June 2, 2022

I started learning on Kodak Gold, so I naturally developed a love/hate relationship with it. But, the more I’ve gone back and shot more of it, the more it’s grown on me. My biggest takeaway from going back to it is that it’s not *supposed* to be a professional grade film, so it’s just not going to be as sharp as Portra or some other higher grade films. Personally, the colors are still a bit warm for my taste, but it has a very nostalgic look that I do enjoy.

Kyle Wright

My favorite C41 film

Rated 5 out of 5
November 30, 2021

Kodak Gold is cheap, versatile, and doesn’t show as much grain as its brother Ultramax. Although suitable for most situations when shooting outdoors, this film does best in bright conditions with mountains and trees in the background. Kodak gold also leaves a gold-yellow hue to the images it produces as the name would suggest. I would highly recommend bringing Kodak Gold to beaches, hikes in the summer, and shooting during golden hour

Tenmuter

Kodak Gold

Rated 3 out of 5
June 3, 2020

The film looks way better when X-pros

Joey

Not bad for that point and shoot vintage feel to things

Rated 3 out of 5
January 31, 2020

This film is great for casual shooting and really is price friendly. Definitely not as fine grain or sharp as some professional grade films, but it definitely gets the job done. My only knock on it is the colors are a bit too saturated for my taste.

Joe Feldman

Vintage film

Rated 4 out of 5
January 31, 2020

None of the other Kodak films gives me this vintage-vacation-with-your-family-when-you-were-little feeling. Latitude is okay, but nothing to write home about.

Alex

a personal favorite

Rated 4 out of 5
November 12, 2019

The first time I shot this film it quickly became one of my favorites. The second go around I wasn’t quite as pleased with it because i shot someone of Hispanic decent the way the skin turned out wasn’t entirely to my likely. However I’m not sure if that was lighting or scanning so I’m definitely going to give it quite a few more shots.

Joshua Oliver

Not as good as the 100 speed if you can find it.

Rated 3 out of 5
November 12, 2019

It’s a pretty good overall film if you just want to record an adventure but aren’t planning on professional results. It’s a pretty good learning film as well. I had a lot better results from the 100 speed which is apparently not available around here.

Randy Jiner

Versatile film great price

Rated 3 out of 5
September 27, 2019

Anonymous