Lomography Fantome Kino - Film Gallery

User Reviews

Submit Review
Rated 4 out of 5
4 out of 5 stars (based on 4 reviews)
Very good0%

Submit Your Review


Great but not versatile

Rated 5 out of 5
June 8, 2024

This film is wonderful when purposely shooting to highlight contrast. It is not versatile, but I think that is the point. Very fine grain and high clarity. Get experimenting!

Daniel Winstead

buy 150 mg viagra

Rated 1 out of 5
October 15, 2023

MEMBER QUESTION I know caffeine adversely affects a woman s ability to conceive does walmart sell viagra Ovarian enlargement may occur during or shortly after therapy with clomiphene


Fantome Kino souped in D-96

Rated 5 out of 5
November 19, 2022

My film journey was a bit strange, the sequence was: digital, large format (for about 10 years), MF and recently 35mm.

The first scans of Fantome Kino blew me away, no grain…smooth and I’d have had trouble telling them from a 4×5 scan.

In California there’s enough light to shoot, even overcast or shaded doorways, with a fast enough lens 1.4-2.8.

I developed in Cinestil D-96 and have great mid-tones, or can choose to take my scan towards higher contrast. Subjects have been, New Topographic, bayside, relics….I’ll share a few scans in the image section.

Joel Collier

Beautiful film

Rated 5 out of 5
June 16, 2022

Well I don’t see a lot of feedback on this one, but I personally loved this film. I received the roll as a Christmas gift and finally mustered up the courage to try it. It’s beautiful, intense in contrast, and almost is dreamy in it’s whites. Would highly recommend a go!

Ashley Richardson